San Francisco Personal Injury Lawyer - Defective & Dangerous Products - Most Popular

Infant Suffocation Deaths result in Recall of 2.1 million Stork Craft Cribs

Claude Wyle — Mon, 30 Nov 2009 15:58:05 GMT

We learned earlier this week that more than 2.1 million drop-side cribs by Stork Craft Manufacturing of Canada are being recalled after reports of four infant suffocations. What troubles me is that while the Stork Craft name is being broadcast, many people still don’t know that the dangerous cribs which are being recalled date back to 1993 and nearly 150,000 of the cribs carry the Fisher-Price logo. In total, the Consumer Product Safety Commission has said the recall involves 1.2 million cribs in the United States and almost 1 million in Canada, where Stork Craft is based.

Even more troubling in this case is that the CPSC has admittedly not acted swiftly enough to recall these cribs. Further compounding the problems with the cribs is that they are often passed down from child-to-child within a family and from family-to-family throughout communities. In most cases, original model numbers have long since been lost or forgotten. The recall efforts therefore must be more strenuous before more children are hurt or killed by these defective products.

As defective product attorneys, one of our goals is to eliminate dangerous products from the marketplace and we are happy that the government is finally taking the necessary actions. Unfortunately, as this case demonstrates, we simply cannot rely on the government to ensure that defective products are redesigned or taken out of production. If you or a loved one has been injured as a result of a defective product, please consult an attorney who specializes in the area. Not only may there be compensation for you and your family, but it might also prevent other families from enduring the same tragedy.

Originally posted at InjuryBoard by Claude Wyle

Cribs are not the only dangerous product- Cords on window blinds can choke or strangle a child

Claude Wyle — Tue, 01 Dec 2009 19:38:54 GMT

I wrote last week about the recall of Stork Craft cribs. That recall was prompted by the four infant deaths from suffocation caused by a badly designed product—the drop side crib. While I applaud the media attention given to these infant deaths from defective products, I want to make sure that everyone is aware that there are many additional dangerous products.

For example, in November of this year, a 2-year-old Maryland boy, Thapelo Kwofie, was strangled after his head became entangled in window cords.

In fact, according to the Consumer Product Safety Commission, about one child dies each month from strangling in cords from blinds or shades. Manufacturers of defective blinds have recalled 5 million window treatments – which the agency lists among the top five "hidden dangers" in the home – in just the past few months.

For the first time, the safety commission now recommends using only cordless window treatments in any home where there is a danger of death of a child by such an accident, including where children live or visit, such as a grandparent's house or day care center.

As defective product attorneys, we join Parents for Window Blind Safety in urging you to inspect all the window blinds in your home. Even many blinds that were considered safe in recent years have been found to be dangerous.

How to make window treatments safer

1. Install only cordless window treatments in all homes where children live or visit, especially in children's bedrooms.

2. Move all cribs, beds and furniture away from windows.

3. If not using cordless shades, cut the ends of pull cords, so that the loop can't form a noose.

4. Don't allow cords to dangle. Wrap cords around a hook that's high off the floor out of a child's reach.

5. If using Roman shades with hidden strings on the back side, raise the shades high enough so children can't reach them.

Free safety kits to retrofit window blinds are available at windowcoverings.org.

Sources: Consumer Product Safety Commission, Window Coverings Safety Council

Originally posted at InjuryBoard by Claude Wyle

Runaway Toyota Cases Ignored

Claude Wyle — Sat, 14 Nov 2009 10:25:00 GMT

Safety investigators dismissed numerous reports of sudden acceleration, then said data were lacking.

I am sure many of you were shocked to learn that since 2001, more than 1,000 Toyota and Lexus owners have reported that their vehicles suddenly accelerated on their own. In some cases, the runaway Toyotas slammed into trees, parked cars and brick walls, among other obstacles.

The crashes resulted in at least 19 wrongful deaths and scores of injuries over the last decade. Federal regulators say that is far more than any other automaker has experienced.

Luckily, owner complaints have helped instigate at least eight investigations into sudden acceleration in Toyota and Lexus vehicles by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration in the last seven years. Unfortunately, Toyota Motor Corp. recalled fewer than 85,000 vehicles in response to two of those probes, and the federal agency closed six other cases without finding a defect.

But, and here is what I find distressing, those investigations systematically excluded or dismissed the majority of complaints by owners that their Toyota and Lexus vehicles had suddenly accelerated, which sharply narrowed the scope of the probes.

For reasons that are not now clear, Federal officials eliminated several categories of sudden-acceleration complaints, including those in which drivers said they were unable to stop runaway cars using their brakes; incidents of unintended acceleration lasting more than a few seconds; and reports in which owners did not identify the possible causes of the problem.

Meanwhile, fatal crashes involving Toyota vehicles continued to mount and the statistics are not good for Toyota: NHTSA records show that a total of 15 people died in crashes related to possible sudden acceleration in Toyota vehicles from the 2002 model year and newer, compared with 11 such deaths in vehicles made by all other automakers.

The Los Angeles Times is reporting that it located federal and other records of 19 fatalities involving Toyota and Lexus vehicles from the same model years in which sudden or unintended acceleration may have been a factor, as well as more than 1,000 reports by owners that their vehicles had suddenly accelerated. Independent safety expert Sean Kane, president of Safety Research and Strategies, said he has identified nearly 2,000 sudden-acceleration cases for Toyota vehicles built since 2001.

Other experts say the numbers may be far higher, pointing to a 2007 NHTSA survey of 600 Lexus owners that found 10% complained they had experienced sudden acceleration.

Most sudden accelerations did not result in a crash, but there were notable exceptions. Bulent Ezal, a retired engineer, plunged 70 feet off a Pismo Beach cliff into the Pacific Ocean surf. He was hospitalized with minor injuries, but his wife of 46 years was killed.

"By the time they pulled me out, the tide was about to cover the car," Ezal said.

He said his 2005 Camry had suddenly accelerated in a parking lot.

In its research, The Times examined thousands of federal defect investigation records, complaints filed with NHTSA by Toyota and Lexus owners, lawsuits against the company, and reports by independent safety experts and local police agencies.

For its part, Toyota is blaming the latest incident on an incorrectly installed floor mat that jammed the accelerator pedal. The company announced a recall of 3.8 million vehicles in September and is designing a fix aimed at preventing sudden acceleration caused by floor mats.

What scares me is that this recall is not addressing other potential problems, including electronic engine control system or cruise control system. So, if you have a Lexus or Toyota on the list below, please be aware of these issues and see an attorney, possibly even a “runaway Toyota attorney” to evaluate your case and determine whether Toyota may be liable for your damages.

The recall affects the following Toyota models: the 2007-2010 Camry, the 2004-2009 Prius, the 2005-2010 Avalon, the 2005-2010 Tacoma and the 2007-2010 Tundra, as well as the 2007-2010 Lexus ES 350 and the 2006-2010 Lexus IS 250 and IS 350.

Originally posted at InjuryBoard by Claude Wyle

Target to Pay 7 Million for Brain Injury to Elderly Woman

Claude Wyle — Wed, 14 Oct 2009 23:41:12 GMT

Target Corporation. will pay $7 million to an 80-year-old woman who suffered brain injuries after being struck by an automatic door at an Illinois store. In the lawsuit, head injury attorneys alleged that Target failed to properly inspect the door or to follow safety guidelines provided by the manufacturer. Putman suffers ongoing head injury symptoms including cognitive problems because of her brain injuries and now lives in a nursing home. We applaud Ms. Putnam’s brain injury lawyers who clearly knew how to best present this woman’s injuries.

This case demonstrates the importance of knowing and protecting your rights. Many consumers would believe that big companies such as Target are immune from or unresponsive to claims by individuals. Many people would believe that injuries to the elderly are not worth the investment of resources, since their life expectancy is not very long in comparison to younger people, and they have no lost wages. This is not entirely true. The elderly have every right to a safe environment and probably more need for it. If you suffer serious personal injuries while going about your daily activities, please consult a lawyer to see whether the responsible party should pay for your medical bills, lost wages disability or earnings and other injury related damages.

Originally posted at InjuryBoard by Claude Wyle

More Top Tips For Avoiding Dangerous Toys

Claude Wyle — Thu, 22 Nov 2007 15:34:13 GMT

To choose appropriate safe toys for children, be a label reader. Look out for the toy labels that give you age and safety recommendations and then use that information as your guide. But, don't rely 100% on the labels. Inspect the toys yourself. Choose toys appropriate for the age, abilities, skills and interest level of your child. Pick toys with sturdy construction, such as well-secured eyes, noses and other potential small parts, and avoid toys with lots of little accessories or items that may be swallowed or aspirated. These are dangerous toys for little children. This next tip is key, as we see mistakes here turn tragic too often.

Keep the toys which are appropriate for older children away from younger siblings or neighbors.
For any and all children, especially those under age 8, avoid toys with sharp edges or points, or that stiff plastic wrapping that can cut. Once the gifts are open, do not delay throwing out plastic wrappings before they become potentially hazardous play things.
Next, please understand that projectile toys such as darts and sling shots, or air rockets, are only for older children, and that failure to take proper precautions improper use of these toys can result in serious eye injuries.
Next, when charging batteries, children should be supervised by adults. Either chargers or adapters can present burn hazards to children. It is a good idea to pay attention to all instructions and warnings on battery chargers.
And, after you have paid careful attention to just what toys are safe to buy, then you should remember to supervise your children closely.
To see further detail and to subscribe to emails from CPSC's web site, please go to:
http://www.cpsc.gov/cpscpub/prerel/prhtml08/08086.html

For more information on this subject, please refer to the section on Defective and Dangerous Products.

Originally posted at InjuryBoard by Claude Wyle

Crocs Shoes And Escalator Accidents

Claude Wyle — Tue, 18 Sep 2007 15:30:05 GMT

Crocs shoes, those popular plastic clogs with the soft soles that children love to wear, have been linked to accidents worldwide that involve the shoes becoming caught in escalators. Mostly small children are suffering toe and foot injuries in San Francisco and throughout the world. Officials at air and train terminals and malls have begun posting warnings to passengers about wearing the shoes on their moving stairways. Toes are getting caught in escalators because of these dangerous products. According to reports appearing across the U.S. and as far away as Singapore and Japan, foot entrapments occur because of the flexibility and grip of the Crocs shoes, which may be causing them to get caught in the "teeth" at the bottom or top of the escalator, or between the steps and the side of the escalator. Is your child wearing Crocs? Be extra careful when they step onto of off of an escalator. Or, better yet, hide them or throw them away, if they are dangerous.

For more information on this subject matter please refer to our section on Defective and Dangerous Products.

Originally posted at InjuryBoard by Claude Wyle

"Cars" Backpacks Sold At Target Recalled Because of Dangerous Magnets

Claude Wyle — Wed, 24 Oct 2007 14:08:58 GMT

This last Tuesday, the Consumer Product Safety Commission recalled 110,000 children's backpacks because they contain potentially dangerous small magnets. Safety officials said that the movie "Cars" themed backpacks contain game pieces with tiny plastic magnets that can break free, and which might be ingested by children. The potentially dangerous children's backpacks were sold at Target stores from February to September, 2007. Remember, if children swallow these tiny magnets, they may stick together inside their bodies and require surgical intervention to remove them. If you bought one of these backpacks for your child, please beware of the potential danger of this product, and consider returning the backpack to Target or wherever you bought it.

For more information on this subject, please refer to the section on Defective and Dangerous Products.

Originally posted at InjuryBoard by Claude Wyle

Deadly Product Threatens Child Safety, Consumer Commission Powerless

Claude Wyle — Mon, 23 Jul 2007 08:40:21 GMT

A recalcitrant company is refusing to pull the Meerkat 50 Youth ATV off the market, and the Consumer Public Safety Commission (CPSC) is powerless to force the recall. The ATV, marketed to children under 11, poses a high risk of serious injury or death because of numerous defects. These defects include lack of front brakes and parking brakes; and being able to start the vehicle while in gear.

The CPC cannot enforce a recall and is not able to levy fines because President Bush has not been able to a vacancy for over a year and, without a quorum, the commission is restricted from making regulatory decisions or enforcing civil penalties. The President of the manufacturing company refuses to work with the CPSC, reasoning in broken English "hundreds of Americans died by riding ATV every year." [sic].

For more information on this subject, please refer to our section on Defective and Dangerous Products.

Originally posted at InjuryBoard by Claude Wyle

Avoiding Dangerous Toys; Top Tips For This Year

Claude Wyle — Wed, 21 Nov 2007 15:09:45 GMT

This year, 61 different toys, involving more than 25 million product units, were recalled by the CPSC. While, currently, toys are undergoing more inspection and more intense scrutiny than ever before, it pays to be a smart and safe shopper. The following are some of the top toy safety tips for this Holiday Shopping Season.
First, you should know that the leading causes of toy related deaths are choking and aspiration, or breathing in of toy parts. We keep saying it. Avoid toys with small parts for children younger than age three, which can cause choking or aspiration. Next,

Next, Avoid Toys With Magnets For Children Younger Than Six Years Old. The magnets in toys these days are very strong and can cling together inside a child if they are swallowed. This may lead to serious injuries, surgeries, or death, if the magnets come loose and a child swallows the magnets. You should avoid building sets with small magnets, and keep an eye out for recalls involving toys with magnets.
Next, for Riding Toys, such as skateboards, in-line skates, and Razor type scooters. They go fast. They don't steer, or stop well. They should not be used on steep grades. They wobble when you go just a bit too fast. Children go fast, and falls can be deadly. Always (even in the driveway) Always use proper helmets and pads and other safety gear, and make sure that helmets and safety gear are sized to fit. Please visit our toy safety attorney blog tomorrow for more important information about how to avoid dangerous toys.

For more information on this subject, please refer to the section on Defective and Dangerous Products.

Originally posted at InjuryBoard by Claude Wyle

Our Attorneys Fight For Children With Salmonella Food Poisoning

Claude Wyle — Fri, 16 Feb 2007 10:01:31 GMT

As Attorneys who fight for those poisoned through tainted foods, we are again sad to advise that a salmonella food poisoning outbreak has slowly grown to almost 300 cases in 39 states since August 2006. This new national salmonella outbreak has been linked to tainted Peter Pan and Great Value peanut butter, beginning with product code "2111". Approximately 20 percent of the 288 infected people were hospitalized, though thankfully none has died. CDC officials said that 85 percent of those infected said they ate peanut butter. We are Food Poisoning attorneys who are experts in Salmonella cases, having fought through trials with these same issues. Please see our previous blogs on Salmonella and E. Coli cases.

According to the CDC, Salmonella is known each year to infect about 40,000 people in the United States, . Salmonellosis kills about 600 people annually. We believe that this is the first salmonella outbreak associated with peanut butter in U.S. history. They are still investigating how the Salmonella got into the peanut butter. Because of the risk of contamination, the FDA has warned consumers not to eat certain jars of Peter Pan or Great Value peanut butter. The tainted jars are produced by ConAgra in one plant in Sylvester, Ga. Although only one particular batch is known to be contaminated, ConAgra is recalling all Peter Pan and Great Value peanut butter.
Attorneys who represent victims of Salmonella food poisoning need to be experts in the medical issues related to salmonellosis. Medical complications from Salmonella food poisoning are often difficult connect and to prove to a jury. Make sure that if you have suffered food poisoning, your attorney has access to the very best medical experts in infectious disease, so they can prove your case.

Originally posted at InjuryBoard by Claude Wyle